The extreme body scrub treatment on aleo pv panels.
Remembering the huge dust storms hitting NSW in January this year, and as we enter another period of potentially threatening extreme weather events, a couple of questions come in mind.
- What does sand and dust do to solar panels, how does it affect the longevity of your solar investment, what happens to performance and reliability due to abrasion?
Aleo solar modules were put to the test with sand being blown at 65km/h for 4 hours, 2 hours on each side, and particles measuring 380 micromilimeters in diameter. And although NASA recorded much bigger particles of 2 millimeters+ during the NSW sand storms on Jan 11th earlier this year, learn why this test is still so important when the durability factor comes into play. Find out one more reason why your investment on aleo solar panels is guaranteed for 25 years. Better Save than sorry:
We took our panels to a renowned institute, where they spent four hours (2hours per side) being blown by a mix of dust and sand particles with a diameter of 380µm, at a speed of 18m/s, over a delimited area of the front and back side. All that in a sauna at 63°C (145,4°F), positioned orthogonally to the sand beam. Not really. Passing this test has its relevance, although it usually goes quite unnoticed, and is confused among others considered more important. Let’s see why. • Dust and sand particles of 380µm are classified as medium sand (ISO 14688-1:2017), 95% made of silicon. • 18m/s corresponds to approx. 65km/h. Just to give you an idea, a haboob (very intense wind carrying mass of dust and sand, typical of desert areas) blows at speeds between 35-100km/h.
This test is performed to evaluate the ability of materials to operate in blowing sand conditions without degrading their performance, effectiveness, and reliability due to abrasion. In this very case backsheet and glass are under special surveillance: the sand that is blown on the module behaves like sandpaper scraping the surface of the front glass and the film on the rear side. aleo passed this test because, besides other criteria, glass and backsheet showed no evidence of major visual defects, as shown in the pictures below and because the electrical safety of the panel was not compromised. In May this year, in a Dupont™ study conducted on 3GW power, 9 million panels and 551 installations in North America, Europe, Asia and the Middle East, it was found that 16% of the panels (1,440,000 pieces) had defects due to backsheet aging / wear / abrasion. There was even an increase from 5 to 23% between the fourth and ninth year after installation (www.photovoltaics.dupont.com). The causes were attributed to the need of a number of manufacturers to lower production costs in order to be more competitive and the consequent use of thinner and thinner layers of polymer film. But passing this test alone doesn’t mean plants will assure high yields in the long run, if not properly maintained. Indeed, sand and dust sediments, in addition to being potentially hazardous in terms of safety (in extreme cases they can lead to fire if the junction box is not properly sealed), also affect the performance of the panel. Between 2014 and 2015, TÜV Rheinland has calculated losses of up to 3.7% in the case of unmaintained installations (i.e. not regularly cleaned). |